Beyond Closed Research Metrics: Rethinking Research Discovery and Rankings (part 2 of 2)
Traditionally, academic publishing has been closed, which means that readers can only access research outputs if you or the institution you are affiliated with pay for them through subscriptions. However, research metrics – approximate measures of how many papers have been published and how often they have been cited – are created by the same companies that publish and index the research. These commercial interests mean that research metrics such as Clarivate’s “Journal Impact Factor” and the Scopus “CiteScore” are biased in such a way that they reward publishing and citing sources within these same companies. This means that university ranking systems based on these metrics are also biased; therefore, proprietary research metrics and commercial university rankings are all part of the same closed research infrastructure. Recently, many institutions have started to withdraw from this closed, commercially-driven research infrastructure, as detailed in part 1 of this post , which als...